A Report that lay in the never dusted and dingy cupboards of MoD for over six decades has been finally revealed, ironically by a foreign journalist, Neville Maxwell. Tens of Defence Ministers,Defence Secretaries and their acolytes must have read it out of sheer curiosity, but most regrettably kept it hidden from Indian public and the Indian Army as it was classified "Top Secret".
How bizarre that after knowing the truth of the catastrophic debacle it never occurred to any Indian Govt, over the last 60 years,to face the truth and redeem the prestige of one of the top rated Army's in the world, the Indian Army,that was humiliated in a crushing defeat due to the ineptness and alter ego of the Indian Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru and the maniacal stupidity of the Defence Minister, Krishna Menon. Entire political class, who has been at the helm of affairs for last six decades, is answerable to the Indian nation and its people, for their skulduggery in hiding the truth that sharply contradicts the popular version floated by the successive Govts, "India as the aggrieved party".
As revealed by Maxwell, the McMahon Line is not a legal boundary; it is an Indian claim line which was never recognised by the Chinese.Yet, as Maxwell says, the Chinese were willing to negotiate with Indian Govt and perhaps, ratify the same as a recognised boundary between the two countries.But then Nehru took this nonsensical absurd approach: “I won’t negotiate, I’ll tell them where the boundary is. Tell them “That’s our boundary. There’s no question about it, there’s no dispute, it’s non-negotiable. You must accept it.” This no brainer was most unfortunately followed by the ill conceived ‘forward policy’ which precipitated the dispute - a lasting curse for both countries. An act of great personal folly for which Nehru was not excused by Mao who said,"Since Nehru sticks his head out and insists on us fighting him, for us not to fight with him would not be friendly enough;courtesy emphasizes reciprocity.(Henry Kissinger in his book "On China")
Well, that is history now,but what about the successive Govts, who because of their unwillingness to accept the truth and share its lessons with the nation took a holier than though approach towards China, "the aggressor"and continued to shape their policy as a victim of China's wrong doing. On the other hand, having known the facts of 1962 and historical truth of McMahon, Caroes’ alignment, could our Govts have taken a more measured/nuanced and mutually acceptable, practical and rationale approach towards resolving the boundary dispute with China.This would be possible if custodians of peoples faith and hopes, the politicians, unremittingly look out for the country's interests above all else.
How bizarre that after knowing the truth of the catastrophic debacle it never occurred to any Indian Govt, over the last 60 years,to face the truth and redeem the prestige of one of the top rated Army's in the world, the Indian Army,that was humiliated in a crushing defeat due to the ineptness and alter ego of the Indian Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru and the maniacal stupidity of the Defence Minister, Krishna Menon. Entire political class, who has been at the helm of affairs for last six decades, is answerable to the Indian nation and its people, for their skulduggery in hiding the truth that sharply contradicts the popular version floated by the successive Govts, "India as the aggrieved party".
As revealed by Maxwell, the McMahon Line is not a legal boundary; it is an Indian claim line which was never recognised by the Chinese.Yet, as Maxwell says, the Chinese were willing to negotiate with Indian Govt and perhaps, ratify the same as a recognised boundary between the two countries.But then Nehru took this nonsensical absurd approach: “I won’t negotiate, I’ll tell them where the boundary is. Tell them “That’s our boundary. There’s no question about it, there’s no dispute, it’s non-negotiable. You must accept it.” This no brainer was most unfortunately followed by the ill conceived ‘forward policy’ which precipitated the dispute - a lasting curse for both countries. An act of great personal folly for which Nehru was not excused by Mao who said,"Since Nehru sticks his head out and insists on us fighting him, for us not to fight with him would not be friendly enough;courtesy emphasizes reciprocity.(Henry Kissinger in his book "On China")
Well, that is history now,but what about the successive Govts, who because of their unwillingness to accept the truth and share its lessons with the nation took a holier than though approach towards China, "the aggressor"and continued to shape their policy as a victim of China's wrong doing. On the other hand, having known the facts of 1962 and historical truth of McMahon, Caroes’ alignment, could our Govts have taken a more measured/nuanced and mutually acceptable, practical and rationale approach towards resolving the boundary dispute with China.This would be possible if custodians of peoples faith and hopes, the politicians, unremittingly look out for the country's interests above all else.
